[Fedora-packaging] Re: cmake guideline update proposal

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Tue Jun 26 22:49:20 UTC 2007

On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 03:25:57PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "RD" == Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> writes:
> RD> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/cmake
> I'm not even sure this kind of thing needs to go through the packaging
> committee.  For example, I doubt rpm maintainers would consult us if
> they wanted to change, say, the %configure macro.  This seems to me to
> be something best worked out between the cmake maintainer(s) and
> packagers who need the %cmake macro.
> But if you want an ack, +1 assuming that the cmake-using packagers
> have been consulted.

+1 from me, too. Like Jason says it's probably an implementation
detail and for example with redhat-rpm-config we've been only given
recommendations and have not been feeling authoritatively (maybe it's
a grey zone in the FPC's mandate), but if it's considered out business
to decide +1 with an FPC hat on, as well. :)
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20070627/ce198c68/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list