[Fedora-packaging] %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/ %doc?

[Toshio Kuratomi]

On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 22:08 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 18:28 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > Should files under %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html be marked as %doc?  They are
> > API docs for libraries which are extracted using the gtk-doc toolset and
> > viewable in devhelp.  I've never seen a set of files that was necessary
> > for the runtime operation of a library (and doubt that I will... they're
> > API docs and usually included in a -devel subpackage.)  On my current
> > system I haven't found any files in %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html that are
> > marked as %doc.
> 
> They should be considered %doc, yes.  But the right way to do so is to
> get it added to the list of docDirs within rpm.  Attached patch should
> do it.
> 
Great!  Are you sending this on or should I open a bug against rpm?

-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20070628/08cd69fd/attachment.sig>