[Fedora-packaging] Is this license okay for a fedora package?
Jason L Tibbitts III
tibbs at math.uh.edu
Wed Mar 28 20:09:41 UTC 2007
>>>>> "JW" == Jarod Wilson <jwilson at redhat.com> writes:
JW> I'd like to package up Maia Mailguard, and the license appears to
JW> be original BSD (advertising clause included) with a branding
JW> extension added. Thoughts?
In a way it's sort of like the GFDL with its invariant section. I
personally think that kind of thing renders the software "non-free",
but I'm not a lawyer.
See also http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/02/msg00178.html
More information about the Fedora-packaging