[Fedora-packaging] Is this license okay for a fedora package?

Jarod Wilson jwilson at redhat.com
Thu Mar 29 02:47:03 UTC 2007

Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>>>>>> "JW" == Jarod Wilson <jwilson at redhat.com> writes:
> JW> Another thing to consider... How different is this from the
> JW> Firefox case?
> Firefox has no requirement that it carry any display or notice as far
> as I know.  In fact, Debian removes these completely.  The license in
> question explicitly prohibits this.  It seems to be in fact the polar
> opposite from the Firefox case.

I think I was somehow abstractly attempting to tie them together via 
"mostly free, but has some sort of restriction relating to included 
graphics, which is what made debian give it the boot". Or something. 
Okay, just ignore that thought.

Jarod Wilson
jwilson at redhat.com

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list