[Fedora-packaging] FESCO responses to PC drafts 2007-03-29
Tom "spot" Callaway
tcallawa at redhat.com
Fri Mar 30 13:20:04 UTC 2007
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 13:19 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> I figure it's worth writing this up.
> FESCO approves, but Warren would like a comment added to the effect
> that packagers should document in the specfile any weird upstream
> versioning conventions which they're trying to massage into a
> sortable RPM EVR.
> I indicated that I did not believe that the PC would have any issue
> with adding such a comment.
> FESCO is onboard here, but the issue is down to implementation. And
> of course there's an ongoing thread in fedora-devel.
> FESCO approves.
Thanks tibbs. :)
More information about the Fedora-packaging