[Fedora-packaging] Second user/group handling draft
Ville Skyttä
ville.skytta at iki.fi
Sat May 12 09:38:22 UTC 2007
On Friday 11 May 2007, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> Requiring shadow-utils as opposed to /usr/sbin/{user,group}add cuts down
> on a layer of indirection when resolving deps.
Sure, but it also introduces an indirection within the specfile as we'd no
longer have explicit scriptlet dependencies to executables being used in
them. I think this is somewhat frowned upon, but I can't find a guideline
reference right now.
BTW, somehow I feel that if the dependency would be on shadow-utils, it'd be
more natural to also invoke useradd/groupadd from $PATH without
hardwired /usr/sbin (or %{_sbindir}). Anyone else have the same feeling?
More information about the Fedora-packaging
mailing list