[Fedora-packaging] Draft Changes to static libraries

[Richard W.M. Jones]

Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> == Exclusion of Static Libraries ==

Can we exclude OCaml from this, because upstream are highly unlikely to 
add full support for dynamic linking.

> === Packaging Static Libraries ===

This one looks OK (from an OCaml p.o.v.)

> === Staticly Linking Executables ===

Again, OCaml binaries are always statically linked to OCaml libraries 
(not to the C libraries they may use however).

Rich.

-- 
Emerging Technologies, Red Hat - http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/
Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod
Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, United Kingdom.  Registered in
England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3237 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20070522/d2cdedca/attachment.bin>