[Fedora-packaging] Review Guidelines simplifications

Till Maas opensource at till.name
Fri Sep 7 17:10:05 UTC 2007

On Fr September 7 2007, Matthias Clasen wrote:

> I'm not sure I see the point of this. The package must be buildable on
> the Fedora Buildsystem anyway, to enter the package collection. Pointing
> out that koji can do scratch builds as an alternative to mock for
> testing buildability might be useful, tough.

It simplifies the review guidelines. Instead of at least a demanded local 
rpmbuild and optional builds for every architecture and in mock and verifying 
the BuildRequires (either with rpmdev-rmdevelrpms or mock) only one step is 
needed. The advantage is also that always building for every architecture ist 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20070907/b024627f/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list