[Fedora-packaging] Packaging/NamingGuidelines python modules naming

Tom "spot" Callaway tcallawa at redhat.com
Sat Sep 8 17:04:26 UTC 2007


On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 22:03 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> On Fr September 7 2007, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> > On Friday 07 September 2007, Till Maas wrote:
> > > On Do September 6 2007, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> > > > I would personally call it python-fuse anyway for consistency, and
> > > > perhaps add "Provides: fuse-python = VR", but maybe that's just me.
> > >
> > > Is doing it the other way round not good enough?
> > >
> > > Name: fuse-python
> > > Provides: python-fuse = VR
> >
> > Good enough for whom?  Both of those definitely satisfy the current naming
> 
> Good enough for a user, will there be any differences if one uses yum to 
> search for "fuse-python" or "python-fuse" or will both produce the same 
> result?

I don't think that yum search looks through provides, but I could be
wrong on that. Should be easy enough to test (run repoquery on the one
package, point yum at the new "repo" and run a search).

~spot




More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list