[Fedora-packaging] "gconfd-2: no process killed" messages
michel.sylvan at gmail.com
Mon Sep 24 04:19:43 UTC 2007
On 22/09/2007, Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta at iki.fi> wrote:
> On Saturday 22 September 2007, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > + g_spawn_command_line_sync ("/usr/bin/killall -q -TERM "
> > GCONF_SERVERDIR "/" GCONFD, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> Hm, ScriptletSnippets advices to use -HUP; is -TERM instead of it intentional?
The next time an application uses GConf, the daemon is automatically
respawned anyway, right? So there should be no difference between -HUP
More information about the Fedora-packaging