[Fedora-packaging] GCJ Clarification (was Re: More Java guidelines questions)

[Toshio Kuratomi]

Andrew Haley wrote:
> Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> Andrew Haley wrote:
>>> Amazing -- I never even imagined that such a thing as an annotation-only
>>> package might exist!  The guidelines are intended to allow reasonable
>>> people to interpret them sensibly.  In this case, AOT-compiling wouldn't
>>> hurt but wouldn't be of much benefit, so I don't think it matters.
>>>
>> Andrew, if you could propose some wording changes to the Guidelines for
>> this it would be most appreciated.
> 
> OK.
> 
> "In some rare cases Java packages might not contain any executable code
> whatsoever, so AOT-compiling for gcj would not be required.  An example
> of such a package would be one that contained only annotations."
>

This seems like a clarification rather than a change.  If this breaks 
anyone's expectations and they wants to vote on it speak now and we can 
take this up at the FPC Meeting otherwise I'll just add it to the top of:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/GCJGuidelines

-Toshio

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20080416/0315ab88/attachment.sig>