[Fedora-packaging] Let's discuss... Javascript!

[Toshio Kuratomi]

Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>>>>>> "TK" == Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger at gmail.com> writes:
> 
> TK> If discussion here leads me to the conclusion that we do want to
> TK> treat javascript libraries like other libraries in the system,
> TK> I'll formalize that into something appropriate for the Guidelines.
> 
> I agree that we should try to do this when it makes sense.
> Unfortunately codifying "makes sense" into a guideline is kind of
> difficult.
> 
> There is already at least one javascript package in Fedora: MochiKit.
> The package is clean and is something that we should look at when
> writing guidelines.
> 
Added a bit of the MochiKit spec as a template.

BTW: We have Ivazquez to thank for the excellent work on that package :-)

-Toshio

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20080401/85f2352b/attachment.sig>