[Fedora-packaging] Static Library Policy Draft Changes
orion at cora.nwra.com
orion at cora.nwra.com
Wed Apr 9 02:28:53 UTC 2008
>
> On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 17:51 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
>> As promised, here is my new proposed draft for handling static libs:
>>
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/StaticLibraryPolicy
> -1
>
> I don't understand the difference between #2 and #3.
>
> Also I don't find the *-nonshared packages useful.
>
I assume the point would be to ban BR: *-static in Fedora packages, but
allow BR: *-nonshared - i.e. when there is no alternative. Is that
correct?
- orion
More information about the Fedora-packaging
mailing list