[Fedora-packaging] Re: OCaml library packaging - no-arch for non-devel?

[Axel Thimm]

On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 02:05:41PM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 18:55 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > If you can suggest a way to write a spec file so that the main package
> > is noarch and subpackages are arch-dependent, please let us know.
> 
> Not really possible without having the buildsystem do multiple passes
> (like kernel), which we really want to avoid.

Maybe a feature request for rpm 4.7? E.g. BuildArch per %package?
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20080808/506479ee/attachment.sig>