[Fedora-packaging] How to handle unversioned upstream tarballs?
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
ivazqueznet at gmail.com
Fri Aug 29 12:04:37 UTC 2008
On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 06:55 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "IV" == Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet at gmail.com> writes:
>
> IV> Except when you have different versions of Fedora having different
> IV> versions of the package.
>
> I fail to see what difference that makes. Of course you version the
> package itself.
Won't they conflict in the lookaside cache?
--
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet at gmail.com>
PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20080829/a5160c85/attachment.sig>
More information about the Fedora-packaging
mailing list