[Fedora-packaging] Ownership of /usr/share/gnome/help

[Patrice Dumas]

On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 01:34:55PM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> 
> Maybe there isn't a general case conclusion to draw but it sounds like
> treating help as an optional feature is what was decided for at least
> the desktop-team's subset of packages.  We didn't generate any

Indeed, and I remember there were some bugs filled. But the thread
shows that there was no consensus, and, for example, I kept yelp as
a gnochm dependency, considering that having a help window that comes
when clicking on help wasn't optional, and that the bloat wasn't too
important given that it already was a gnome app.

That being said, I orphaned gnochm, so everybody is free to remove 
yelp :)

# repoquery --whatrequires yelp
gtranslator-0:1.1.7-9.fc10.i386
gnomesword-0:2.4.1-1.fc10.i386
gnochm-0:0.9.11-2.fc9.noarch
lat-0:1.2.3-4.fc10.i386
conglomerate-0:0.9.1-5.fc9.i386
gnucash-docs-0:2.2.0-2.fc8.noarch
gnomesword-0:2.4.0-1.fc10.i386

--
Pat