[Fedora-packaging] Duplication of documentation in subpackages
pertusus at free.fr
Fri Feb 15 23:34:25 UTC 2008
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 06:28:46PM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 10:18 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > But, in my opinion, in packages that don't depend on each other,
> > duplicating at least the license makes sense (though should not be
> > mandatory).
> I've got no problem with this approach, although, I don't necessarily
> want to encourage it, as it could get absurd in packages with a lot of
Indeed. I have no problem with it being discouraged, as long as it is
not forbidden (by the guidelines).
More information about the Fedora-packaging