[Fedora-packaging] Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?
cjdahlin at ncsu.edu
Tue Jan 15 15:35:16 UTC 2008
Karsten Hopp wrote:
> Till proposed in bugzilla #311061 to use alternatives in vim-enhanced
> and vim-X11 so that
> both of them can provide /usr/bin/vim. His reasoning as that when gvim
> gets started as vim
> (via a symlink) it opens the text mode vim with the additional
> benefit of xterm clipboard support.
This can be turned on in vim-enhanced just by adding a few flags to the
spec. It seems not to cause any trouble without an X server too. I've
done it on RHEL.
> I agree with the /usr/bin/vim stuff, but I think a better solution
> would be to add a conflict between
> vim-X11 and vim-enhanced. vim-enhanced is only of use on systems
> without X11/gtk. On all other
> systems vim-X11 can provide the same (and more) functionality as
> Karsten Hopp | Mail: karsten at redhat.de
> Red Hat Deutschland | Tel: +49-711-96437-0
> Hauptstaetterstr.58 | Fax: +49-711-613590
> D-70178 Stuttgart | http://www.redhat.de
More information about the Fedora-packaging