[Fedora-packaging] Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?

Bill Nottingham notting at redhat.com
Tue Jan 15 20:42:38 UTC 2008

Till Maas (opensource at till.name) said: 
> > Define 'X11'. You can remove the servers just fine.
> The X11 that gives the vim-X11 package its name. To be more precise, I meant 
> with X11 every package that provides a requirement for vim-X11, that 
> vim-enhanced does not have.

I just don't see what having a separate package *just* for that gains you,
especially with the complicated lengths suggested in this thread to maintain
it? (alternatives is never the answer...)


More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list