[Fedora-packaging] Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?

Till Maas opensource at till.name
Tue Jan 15 21:48:20 UTC 2008

On Tue January 15 2008, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Michał Bentkowski (mr.ecik at gmail.com) said:
> > 2008/1/15, Till Maas <opensource at till.name>:
> > > Is there an easy way to compare the amount of packages that need to be
> > > installed for vim-X11 but do not need to be installed for vim-enhanced?
> >
> > Here's the list of packages that are required by vim-X11 and NOT
> > required by vim-enhanced:


> If you extrapolate that out to their deps, you get:


> 34 packages. 54MB on disk (x86_64).

How did you generate these lists? The only way I found, was to compare the 
output of "fakeroot yum --installroot=/tmp/foo install $package" (after 
hardcoding releasever=7 in /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yum/config.py 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20080115/c542f5b1/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list