[Fedora-packaging] Possible restructuring of docbook-related packages?
Robert P. J. Day
rpjday at crashcourse.ca
Wed Jan 16 18:58:31 UTC 2008
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 13:10 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > i'm wondering if there might be some benefit to repackaging some of
> > the docbook-related packages.
> >
> > first, there are the two "utils" packages:
> >
> > docbook-utils
> > docbook-utils-pdf
>
> We're not mandating this split. You should open a bug against this
> package and see if the maintainer is willing to stop doing it.
ok, just so long as there was no obvious rationale about that split
that i was overlooking. thanks.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Home page: http://crashcourse.ca
Fedora Cookbook: http://crashcourse.ca/wiki/index.php/Fedora_Cookbook
========================================================================
More information about the Fedora-packaging
mailing list