[Fedora-packaging] Possible restructuring of docbook-related packages?

Robert P. J. Day rpjday at crashcourse.ca
Wed Jan 16 18:58:31 UTC 2008

On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:

> On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 13:10 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > i'm wondering if there might be some benefit to repackaging some of
> > the docbook-related packages.
> >
> >   first, there are the two "utils" packages:
> >
> >   docbook-utils
> >   docbook-utils-pdf
> We're not mandating this split. You should open a bug against this
> package and see if the maintainer is willing to stop doing it.

ok, just so long as there was no obvious rationale about that split
that i was overlooking.  thanks.


Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

Home page:                                         http://crashcourse.ca
Fedora Cookbook:    http://crashcourse.ca/wiki/index.php/Fedora_Cookbook

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list