[Fedora-packaging] Reviewing an existing package with major changes

Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams ivazqueznet at gmail.com
Mon Jan 21 17:34:46 UTC 2008

On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 17:08 +0000, Bruno Postle wrote:
> Not sure if this is the right list for this question.  Sorry I can't 
> find anything about this in the wiki.
> I'm planning on updating the hugin package, but there have been so 
> many changes that the spec file is largely rewritten - I've split 
> out a hugin-base sub-package, the build system has changed to cmake, 
> there are now .so libraries etc...
> Should I submit a bugzilla review request even though this is an 
> 'old' package?

If you can make it so that a user can type "yum update" to update the
packages and still use the application the same way as before then I
don't see a need for a re-review.

Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet at gmail.com>

PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20080121/6dae8e18/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list