[Fedora-packaging] tex/latex doc install location
José Matos
jamatos at fc.up.pt
Tue Jan 15 16:25:49 UTC 2008
On Tuesday 15 January 2008 16:03:28 Patrice Dumas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In tex/latex bundled in fedora (I guess it comes from tetex and it is
> now in texlive) there is a simple system to view documentation. The
> files are found below /usr/share/texmf/doc using kpathsea (so hopefully
> rapidly) and opened using the appropriate application (currently using
> xdg-open for everything...).
>
> In fedora should we use this system and put the doc files below
> /usr/share/texmf/doc/ or use %doc?
Notice that this is in line with other languages, the documentation for R
packages (as an example) in under the R tree. I would like to favour the
texmf tree as the natural packaging place of latex documentation.
The package that started this discussion is the review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428686
I would like to use this package to be an example to draft the fedora
(la)tex package guidelines. Sooner or later we need them and now is good
time. :-)
Notice that the package follows the consensus on this list in August, naming
the package as tex-simplecv.
All feedback is welcome. :-)
> --
> Pat
--
José Abílio
More information about the Fedora-packaging
mailing list