[Fedora-packaging] Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?

[Bill Nottingham]

Michał Bentkowski (mr.ecik at gmail.com) said: 
> 2008/1/15, Till Maas <opensource at till.name>:
> > Is there an easy way to compare the amount of packages that need to be
> > installed for vim-X11 but do not need to be installed for vim-enhanced?
> >
> 
> Here's the list of packages that are required by vim-X11 and NOT
> required by vim-enhanced:
> 
> atk-1.20.0-1.fc8.x86_64
> cairo-1.4.12-1.fc8.x86_64
> glib2-2.14.4-1.fc8.x86_64
> gtk2-2.12.3-3.fc8.i386
> gtk2-2.12.3-3.fc8.x86_64
> libICE-1.0.4-2.fc8.x86_64
> libSM-1.0.2-4.fc8.x86_64
> libX11-1.1.3-4.fc8.x86_64
> libXt-1.0.4-3.fc8.x86_64
> libattr-2.4.38-2.fc8.i386
> libattr-2.4.38-2.fc8.x86_64
> pango-1.18.3-1.fc8.x86_64

If you extrapolate that out to their deps, you get:

atk-1.21.5-1.fc9
cairo-1.5.4-1.fc9
cups-libs-1.3.5-1.fc9
fontconfig-2.5.0-1.fc9
freetype-2.3.5-3.fc8
gamin-0.1.9-4.fc8
glib2-2.15.2-1.fc9
gnutls-2.0.4-1.fc9
gtk2-2.12.5-1.fc9
hicolor-icon-theme-0.10-4
libgcrypt-1.4.0-1
libgpg-error-1.6-1
libICE-1.0.4-2.fc8
libjpeg-6b-40.fc9
libpng-1.2.22-1.fc8
libSM-1.0.2-4.fc8
libthai-0.1.9-2.fc9
libtiff-3.8.2-9.fc8
libX11-1.1.3-4.fc8
libXau-1.0.3-3.fc8
libxcb-1.1-1.fc9
libXcomposite-0.4.0-3.fc8
libXcursor-1.1.9-1.fc8
libXdmcp-1.0.2-4.fc8
libXext-1.0.1-5.fc9
libXfixes-4.0.3-2.fc8
libXft-2.1.12-3.fc8
libXi-1.1.3-3.fc9
libXinerama-1.0.2-3.fc8
libXrandr-1.2.2-2.fc9
libXrender-0.9.4-2.fc9
libXt-1.0.4-4.fc9
pango-1.19.2-1.fc9
pixman-0.9.6-3.fc9
xorg-x11-filesystem-7.1-2.fc6

34 packages. 54MB on disk (x86_64).

Bill