[Fedora-packaging] Early MinGW packaging guidelines draft

Toshio Kuratomi a.badger at gmail.com
Wed Jul 16 15:01:43 UTC 2008


Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:44:54AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>   https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MinGW
>>
>> I'd like to get this discussed at FPC next Tuesday.  If anyone has any
>> technical points on the draft, can you let me know or edit the page.
> 
> Unfortunately I'm double-booked so I can't be at the meeting today.
> 
> Also these packages really need more work on them before presenting
> them to FPC.
> 
> So I'll punt until +2 weeks.
> 
We didn't have enough people for quorum this week.  We'll hold a meeting 
next week (July 22) to see if we can get quorum to pass things.

We did a little talking about cross compiling in general at our meeting. 
  Those who were there thought that having a separate source rpm 
per-package-per-library makes more sense than subpackages (likely 
different maintainers, having to maintain two sets of build instructions 
in the spec, some cross-compilers require more invasive changes, and 
simply not scaling in a general way when we have multiple cross-compilers.)

I'll note that neither Hans nor Ralf were present (both on the embedded 
SIG) and their input could definitely change this but the present 
thinking is that separate packages are the way to go.

-Toshio

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20080716/6bcadd8d/attachment.sig>


More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list