[Fedora-packaging] Re: moc, moc-qt4?

[Chris Spencer]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Yes that makes sense, I suppose what I will do then is look for
'moc-qt4' first, then just 'moc'. However, it would probably be
advantageous for Fedora to include a symlink between moc and moc-qt4,
perhaps with some mechanism to switch between that and moc-qt3.

Anyway, thanks for your help.

Chris.

Rex Dieter wrote:
| Chris Spencer wrote:
|
|
|> I think the easiest thing to do would probably be to just add another
|> check for 'moc-qt4' and fail if it doesn't find either. I guess what I'm
|> really asking is why it was done like this? Developers expect it to be
|> under the name 'moc', renaming it without even a symlink is just going
|> to create problems.
|
| Both qt3 and qt4 provide "moc" (there are other dups, but let's still with
| this example).  So, a convention that most distros use is to ship moc-qt3
| and moc-qt4 (and possibly a 'moc' pointing to one of those).
|
| -- Rex
|
| --
| Fedora-packaging mailing list
| Fedora-packaging at redhat.com
| https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkhjo9IACgkQ6iqRtkAADZjFKgCgiw2mX+gGojlO9K2uvvI2S9dR
cDsAn17XlpIKfYl6jzdNMIEL4iZcITIV
=Oh1M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----