[Fedora-packaging] Unclear in the use of %doc

Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams ivazqueznet at gmail.com
Fri Jun 20 01:35:55 UTC 2008


On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 09:51 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> I'm a bit lost on the use of %doc for manpages.
> 
> I'm building a package of Heimdal Kerberos, so I'm following a lot of
> the MIT krb5 package as a pattern. 
> 
> Should manpages be marked as %doc, or just other documentation?

Files under /usr/share/{man,info} are automagically marked %doc by
rpmbuild.

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet at gmail.com>

PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20080619/4877c7d8/attachment.sig>


More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list