[Fedora-packaging] Unclear in the use of %doc

Andrew Bartlett abartlet at samba.org
Fri Jun 20 02:28:05 UTC 2008

On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 21:35 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 09:51 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > I'm a bit lost on the use of %doc for manpages.
> > 
> > I'm building a package of Heimdal Kerberos, so I'm following a lot of
> > the MIT krb5 package as a pattern. 
> > 
> > Should manpages be marked as %doc, or just other documentation?
> Files under /usr/share/{man,info} are automagically marked %doc by
> rpmbuild.

Following the pattern long-established history and from the MIT krb5
pacakge, I'm using a new directory (yes, I know I need to ask approval)
of /usr/heimdal, so I think that means I need to manually mark them as %

Thanks for the info,

Andrew Bartlett

Andrew Bartlett
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20080620/cb1402ef/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list