[Fedora-packaging] Re: moc, moc-qt4?
rdieter at math.unl.edu
Thu Jun 26 13:59:46 UTC 2008
Chris Spencer wrote:
> I think the easiest thing to do would probably be to just add another
> check for 'moc-qt4' and fail if it doesn't find either. I guess what I'm
> really asking is why it was done like this? Developers expect it to be
> under the name 'moc', renaming it without even a symlink is just going
> to create problems.
Both qt3 and qt4 provide "moc" (there are other dups, but let's still with
this example). So, a convention that most distros use is to ship moc-qt3
and moc-qt4 (and possibly a 'moc' pointing to one of those).
More information about the Fedora-packaging