[Fedora-packaging] Re: RFC: mass rebuild results

Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams ivazqueznet at gmail.com
Fri Mar 14 14:24:50 UTC 2008

On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 09:12 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Karsten Hopp wrote:
> > In my opinion rebuilding packages outside of mock should give me packages
> > with the same features than the original ones. 
> Not a 100% reasonable expectation, imo (esp when on a multilib'd buildhost). 
> That's part of the point of using the minimalist buildroots that mock
> provides.
> > Should I even bother to start filing the most obvious bugs
> Yes(!), especially if your rebuilds highlights missing parts (functionality,
> documentation, etc...).

I was going to write a long and winding followup to the original post,
but I think the following response to this post sums up my position:


Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet at gmail.com>

PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20080314/fbec1b9a/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list