[Fedora-packaging] Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml

Hans de Goede j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl
Mon Mar 3 18:24:00 UTC 2008

Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 16:53 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>  - Clarify where documentation should go.  Currently my practice has
>>    been to put just the license file (if any) in the main package's %doc,
>>    and the license file plus all other documentation & examples in
>>    the devel subpackage.  This duplicates (only) the license file, but
>>    that seems acceptable since we shouldn't distribute software without
>>    its license.
> -devel packages should Require the main package, thus, there really
> isn't any need for the duplicate license copy.




More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list