[Fedora-packaging] Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
Hans de Goede
j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl
Mon Mar 3 18:24:00 UTC 2008
Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 16:53 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> - Clarify where documentation should go. Currently my practice has
>> been to put just the license file (if any) in the main package's %doc,
>> and the license file plus all other documentation & examples in
>> the devel subpackage. This duplicates (only) the license file, but
>> that seems acceptable since we shouldn't distribute software without
>> its license.
> -devel packages should Require the main package, thus, there really
> isn't any need for the duplicate license copy.
More information about the Fedora-packaging