[Fedora-packaging] Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml

Jason L Tibbitts III tibbs at math.uh.edu
Mon Mar 3 20:09:58 UTC 2008

>>>>> "RWMJ" == Richard W M Jones <rjones at redhat.com> writes:

RWMJ> But you could still just install the main package and not devel,

Which is why the license file goes in the base package.  What you
don't need is the second copy in -devel, becauase -devel will bring in
the main package which has the license.

Now, there have even been cases where one srpm generates multiple
packages which have no dependencies; even then, it's not necessary to
include the license in all of them.

 - J<

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list