[Fedora-packaging] FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change

Bill Nottingham notting at redhat.com
Fri Mar 14 04:28:55 UTC 2008

Chuck Anderson (cra at WPI.EDU) said: 
> Is there something wrong with the process that pulls in multilib then?  
> sane-backends-libs-gphoto2 x86_64 repo deps have been broken for a 
> long time due to missing the i386 package in the x86_64 repo.  For 
> reference, here are the contents of the two packages:

Those aren't in the system directories, so they're not considered.

Only things in /usr/{lib,lib64}, or in a package that contains a 
ld.so.conf.d file, are pulled in.


More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list