[Fedora-packaging] any reason why "sdcc" package transforms pgms to non-standard names?
Tom "spot" Callaway
tcallawa at redhat.com
Sun Mar 16 17:35:30 UTC 2008
On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 12:23 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> is this kind of transformation relatively common? the build from
> the sdcc home page itself uses the regular names, so why is the fedora
> packaging rewriting those? does this happen often?
Its not common, nor is it mandated by the packaging guidelines, except
in cases of binary namespace conflicts. I think it would be worthwhile
to ask the sdcc maintainer what the reasoning is for this.
More information about the Fedora-packaging