[Fedora-packaging] Drafts for next Tuesday
rc040203 at freenet.de
Thu Mar 20 03:52:15 UTC 2008
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 18:33 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> This goes out specifically to the Fedora Packaging Committee Members,
> but is certainly open for comments from all.
> We've got a lot of drafts that are queued up for next Tuesday's meeting,
> so it would be very helpful if you read them all well in advance:
> As always, this list is pulled from
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/GuidelinesTodo (which embeds the
> table from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/DraftsTodo ):
> ASCII Naming Guidelines (spot) :
IMO, this proposal is not strict enough.
1. I think, we need to restrict package names to
a-z, A-Z, 0-9, -, _
2. I do not agree to the "When Upstream Naming is outside ..." section.
This section is unnecessarily/avoidable adding confusion for
maintainers. Non-ASCII names have always been banned rsp. technically
impossible ever since Linux exists => this is a non-issue.
> Perl Guidelines (spot) :
> InitDir location (spot) :
> Eclipse Plugin Guidelines (spot) :
> OpenOffice.org extensions guidelines (Caolan McNamara) :
> Secure BuildRoot (Lubomir Kundrak) :
> Register VirtualProvides (Patrice Dumas) :
> SysV-style Initscript Guidelines (spot) :
> I don't have the Java Guidelines draft on the list yet, but I hope that
> it will be ready by next Tuesday:
> Next Tuesday will undoubtedly be a longer meeting than normal, so please
> be prepared.
Friday, Sunday, Monday are public holidays in Germany (Easter).
I'll be off next week (vacation) and therefore will likely not be able
to attend due to other commitments.
More information about the Fedora-packaging