[Fedora-packaging] Java packaging guidelines draft

[Jesse Keating]

On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 17:24 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> Actually a whole pile of stuff has changed then.
> 
> One of the action items from the conference call I attended recently
> was that Fernando would actually document the reasons why we needed
> (and, perhaps, still need) the jpp tag.  If for no other reason than
> we'll actually know.  One reason that I recall heading during the
> conference was the need to be able to easily query for all of the java
> packages on the system in some manner, and we have better query tools
> now (along with packagekit to abstract this kind of thing).  Perhaps
> someone else who was on that call (Jesse?) can say whether I'm
> misremembering.
> 
> But it's certainly a reasonable time to revisit the issue, although
> it's going to be tough to discuss much without that documentation
> about the reasons for the tag.

You got it right Jason, thanks!

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20080325/d27d5765/attachment.sig>