[Fedora-packaging] Re: Java packaging guidelines draft

[Jesse Keating]

On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 21:43 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> I don't recall that.  It was discussed that we'd like to deviate as
> little as possible from JPackage conventions and work with them to get
> critical changes we need accepted there.

Ok, I've made a bad assumption.

What is preventing the Fedora guidelines from becoming the jpackage
guidelines?

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20080325/d824e862/attachment.sig>