[Fedora-packaging] Java packaging guidelines draft

Rex Dieter rdieter at math.unl.edu
Thu Mar 27 19:37:31 UTC 2008

Deepak Bhole wrote:

> An important reason we need the jpp in there currently is to maintain 
> compatibility with JPackage.
> With the way the naming is right now, users can enable a JPackage
> repository beside a Fedora repo, and are guaranteed to get the latest
> either from Fedora or JPackage,...
> e.g package foo is currently at 1.0-1jpp in jpackage and 1.0-1jpp.1 in

Stripping 'jpp' works fine (at least according to my quick-n-dirty use 
of rpmdev-vercmp:

1.0-1jpp < 1.0-2 < 1.0-2jpp

-- Rex

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list