[Fedora-packaging] Java packaging guidelines draft

[Deepak Bhole]

* Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> [2008-03-27 15:37]:
> Deepak Bhole wrote:
>
>> An important reason we need the jpp in there currently is to maintain 
>> compatibility with JPackage.
>> With the way the naming is right now, users can enable a JPackage
>> repository beside a Fedora repo, and are guaranteed to get the latest
>> either from Fedora or JPackage,...
> ...
>> e.g package foo is currently at 1.0-1jpp in jpackage and 1.0-1jpp.1 in
>
> Stripping 'jpp' works fine (at least according to my quick-n-dirty use of 
> rpmdev-vercmp:
>
> 1.0-1jpp < 1.0-2 < 1.0-2jpp
>

Until Fedora does a 1.0-3 to fix something, with the -3 still being
split from the 1jpp, never having acquired the fixes from 1jpp->2jpp

Cheers,
Deepak

> -- Rex
>
> --
> Fedora-packaging mailing list
> Fedora-packaging at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging