[Fedora-packaging] LGPLv2.1 vs. LGPLv2

Tom "spot" Callaway tcallawa at redhat.com
Sun Nov 30 13:55:52 UTC 2008

On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 13:00 -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> I see that the Licensing page [1] treats LGPLv2 and LGPLv2.1 as the 
> same, with a short name of "LGPLv2".  Also, rpmlint complains about 
> LGPLv2.1 in spec files.  Why is this?

Because v2 and v2.1 are the same thing.


More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list