On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 13:00 -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote: > I see that the Licensing page [1] treats LGPLv2 and LGPLv2.1 as the > same, with a short name of "LGPLv2". Also, rpmlint complains about > LGPLv2.1 in spec files. Why is this? Because v2 and v2.1 are the same thing. ~spot