[Fedora-packaging] package review template

[Till Maas]

On Fri October 3 2008, Patrice Dumas wrote:

> I don't think we need that. If you have items that are not on
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines
> they could be added, but I don't think that a template would be more

There are a lot of items that are in the Packaging Guidelines, Naming 
Guidelines, and the Packaging Guidelines for some special packages (python, 
java, perl, ...) that are not summarised in the Review Guidelines.

Regards,
Till
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20081003/772e61cb/attachment.sig>