[Fedora-packaging] package review template

[Ralf Corsepius]

On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 12:49 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Friday, 03 October 2008 at 11:48, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 11:34 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> > > On Fri October 3 2008, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > > 
> > > > However, one of my actual point is a bit different: Once one starts
> > > > formulating such a "template", people will start to nit-pick and to
> > > > argue on (missing) details (e.g. corner-cases) and in longer terms will
> > > > start to demand for "laws", "regulations" and "forms".
> > > 
> > > I guess we have different pictures about such a template. For me it would be 
> > > an itemized list, where each item is a summary of one guideline from all the 
> > > Guideline documents, maybe with an URL that links to the specific guideline. 
> > > The nit-picking should then only affect the normal guidelines.
> 
> > Let me put it differently: I am referring to certain particular people,
> > of whom I find it very obious that they have no clue about what they are
> > doing in reviews.
> 
> Oh, how I hate such vague accusations. Ralf! Please tell us exactly who
> you're referring to and what *exactly* makes you think they have no clue.
I do not intend to flame people and therefore will not mention any names
here.

Ralf