[Fedora-packaging] libgdiplus-devel subpackage

[Sergio Pascual]

And why  .so.0 file in the main package symlinks to the so in devel
instead of linking to the .so.0.0.0 in main?

Sergio

On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Paul <paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently libgdiplus is broken into devel and the main package as per
> the packaging rules. However, the .so.0 files in the main package
> symlink to the -devel, so without the -devel subpackage, libgdiplus has
> problems.
>
> In mono, this is fixed (kind of) by having mono-winforms requiring
> libgdiplus-devel (which pulls in libgdiplus if it's not already
> installed). Not the best solution, but one which works. Obviously, this
> can't be used for libgdiplus.
>
> Given the nature of libgdiplus can an exception be made to this package
> so the .so file is bundled with the main package as well as the .pc
> file? I know it breaks the packaging regs, but I can't think of another
> way around it.
>
> TTFN
>
> Paul
>
> --
> Sie können mich aufreizen und wirklich heiß machen!
>
> --
> Fedora-packaging mailing list
> Fedora-packaging at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
>
>