[Fedora-packaging] README.Dist is preferrable to README.Fedora

Patrice Dumas pertusus at free.fr
Sun Oct 26 15:23:27 UTC 2008

On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 10:12:06AM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "PD" == Patrice Dumas <pertusus at free.fr> writes:
> PD> Are these files really fedora specific, or package specific?
> In the case of my packages, or packages where I have recommended the
> use of README.Fedora, they indicate specific information on how Fedora
> has provided default configurations and any Fedora-specific setup
> necessary (such as indicating that a web application has installed an
> apache config file restricting access to localhost until default
> passwords are changed).

But is it fedora specific, or specific to the setup of the package? In
most case it is linked with how the package is done, but not to fedora,
otherwise said doesn't use any of the fedora specificities. Your example
doesn't seems to use anything fedora specific.


More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list