[Fedora-packaging] Strawman: standardize 8-space tab width

Ville Skyttä ville.skytta at iki.fi
Fri Aug 21 09:06:19 UTC 2009


On Friday 21 August 2009, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 08/21/2009 09:21 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>>> "RC" == Ralf Corsepius<rc040203 at freenet.de>  writes:
> >
> > RC>  Tabs only add marginal unreadablity to specs.
> >
> > Just to be clear, the proposal wasn't to eliminate tabs from specs,
> > although that was proposed later in the thread.  The proposal was to
> > standardize a reasonable tab width.
>
> Define reasonable tab with.
>
> I guess you mean 8, but, whether you like it or not, there is no
> "standardized tab width".
>
> Conversely, there are huge user groups, who "standardized" to other tab
> widths, e.g.
>
> * Some BSDs systematically use a tab width of 4 everywhere.
> * Some vi users typically user a tab width of 3 (I am not using vi, so
> no idea where this originates from).
> * Many users apply a tab width of 2.
> * There are editors, which seem to guess on "best tab expansions".
> ...

You seem to be talking about indent steps instead of tab widths.  They are 
different things.  A lot of projects and people tweak their indent steps to 
their liking (such as in the examples above), but defining tab width is much 
less common and having it set to anything else than 8 is pretty much 
guaranteed to have bad effects somewhere.




More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list