[Fedora-packaging] ExplicitRequires/Commenting Drafts
Toshio Kuratomi
a.badger at gmail.com
Tue Feb 3 18:32:16 UTC 2009
Hey guys,
Since we passed this again with minor changes but one of FESCo's
comments seemed to be that they thought the two changes were being
proposed as a whole, I'm going to split this into two pages. Explicit
Requires will keep the :MUST: and the == Explicit Requires == section.
The new, Non-obvious spec file items will have the :Should: and ==
Non-Obvious Items in Spec Files == section.
The text of both sections will remain unchanged. (spot has already
updated for the FHS removal).
Holler at me if you think this violates our rules.
-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20090203/73258c1c/attachment.sig>
More information about the Fedora-packaging
mailing list