[Fedora-packaging] [Draft][RFC] The use of alternatives
Syed Omer Farooq
omer at mrgc.com.pk
Mon Feb 23 06:21:54 UTC 2009
how to postfix mysql rpm install in fedora 10
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rex Dieter" <rdieter at math.unl.edu>
To: "Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora"
<fedora-packaging at redhat.com>
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 12:03 AM
Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging] [Draft][RFC] The use of alternatives
> Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> Here's a draft that - after deciding which solution is best - should
>>> eventually be put into Packaging Guidelines:
>>> I tried to list all pros and cons of each solution.
>>> I'm personally hesitating between using %ghost or Provides:, but I'd
>>> prefer the Provides: solution.
>> If the only con of the %ghost solution is that it conflicts with "files
>> owned by multiple packages are forbidden"
> I would advocate the use of %ghost. It works, provided the contents of
> all the targets are the same, ie, if they all use:
> touch /far/bar
> Conflicts will arise to simply highlight pkgs not following the convention
> (ie, being a valuable debugging tool).
> -- Rex
> Fedora-packaging mailing list
> Fedora-packaging at redhat.com
More information about the Fedora-packaging