[Fedora-packaging] Vala packaging guidelines - are there any?
Toshio Kuratomi
a.badger at gmail.com
Mon Feb 9 17:48:32 UTC 2009
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Do we have packaging guidelines applicable for the Vala programming
> language? I've reviewed a couple of packages now and they don't have
> a consistent naming convention.
>
> eg:
>
I think our generic naming guidelines[1]_ would recommend:
> vala - the base package
>
Fine.
> emacs-vala - emacs mode
>
Fine. This is an addon to emace.
> gupnp-vala - vala bindings for gupnp (universal plug'n'play) library
>
vala-gupnp. These are an "addon" to vala.
> vtg - "Vala Toys for gEdit" currently under review here:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484360
>
gedit-vtg. This is an addon to gedit.
.. _[1]:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28General.29
If you think the generic guidelines don't apply or don't suggest the
correct thing, feel free to propose an addition.
-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20090209/977b48ba/attachment.sig>
More information about the Fedora-packaging
mailing list