[Fedora-packaging] Re: I wish to package some CC licensed content ...

Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
Fri Feb 20 19:53:42 UTC 2009

Le vendredi 20 février 2009 à 13:14 -0600, Matthew Woehlke a écrit :

> I think Bill Nottingham really hit the nail on the head here with why 
> content should be a separate repo. It's generally unlikely to be tied to 
> a particular Fedora release, ergo putting it in a version-release repo 
> would lead to a lot of unnecessary duplication.

Because our packaging guidelines do not ever change, and rpm has
fossilized, right?

Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20090220/d96c7ffc/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list